Contact Person(s)
Jessie Shelton, Tao Liu More details on this mode may be found in Section 5 of Survey of Exotic Higgs Decays (arXiv:1312.4992).Theoretical Motivations
The signature h→ γ+MET can be usefully represented through the decay of the Higgs into two neutral fermions, h→χ1χ2, followed by the decay χ2→γχ1. This signature can be realized in several ways: First, in low energy GMSB [1], where the Higgs decays into a gravitino and a bino, h→~G ~B followed by ~B → γ~G [2]. For masses in the range mh/2 < m~B < mh, the Higgs decays as above. For lower ~B mass the decay h→ ~B~B will dominate, leading to a h→ 2γ+MET signature instead. Another realization of this signature is in the NMSSM. Here the singlino ~s plays the role of the light fermion, while the heavier one is mostly a bino. The mass splitting between the two fermions is now much more free. However, a light singlino is always accompanied by a light scalar s, and for the loop-induced branching fraction Br(χ2→χ1γ) to be sizable, the tree level decays Br(χ2→ s(*)χ1→ f―f χ1) must be phase-space suppressed. Therefore, in order to have a sizable rate into h→γ+MET, the mass splitting between the two neutralino species should be at most 10-20 GeV. More generally, any SM extension which includes two Majorana fermions, χ2 and χ1, with a dipole moment coupling(1)
Existing Collider Studies
An LHC study was carried out at parton level in [2]. This study targets Higgs bosons produced in gluon fusion and estimates that 20 fb−1 of 8 TeV data would allow 95% CL sensitivity to branching fractions ranging between Br(h→γ+MET) < 0.002 for mχ2 = 120 GeV, and Br(h→γ+MET) < 0.010 for mχ2 = 60 GeV. These results are based on selection criteria that are not obviously compatible with current LHC triggers, however, as the selection of Ref. [2] requires(2)
Existing Experimental Searches and Limits
Very few existing collider searches place any limits on Br(h→γ+MET). The vast majority of existing DM and SUSY searches at both the LHC and the Tevatron use pT cuts that are too hard to be effective for the typical photon pT and MET in this signal.
CMS' supersymmetry search in the γ+MET+jets final state with 4.04 fb−1 of 8 TeV data [4] comes closer to being constraining, although it requires all events to have HT > 450 GeV, implying major reduction in the signal efficiency. The reinterpretation of this search to h→γ+MET is difficult due to signal contamination in a region MET < 100 GeV used to model the dominant QCD background (the light 125 GeV Higgs contributes proportionately more to the control region than does the BSM signal used in the search). This makes the recast likely overconservative to an extent that is difficult to estimate. In Fig. 1 we show the result of performing this recast. With perfect photon efficiency, the 95% CL limits obtained on Br(h→γ+MET) is approximately unity in a large range of parameter space, suggesting that an analysis more tailored to the signal kinematics could place meaningful limits on the branching fraction for this channel.
Figure 1: Approximate 95% C.L. upper limit on (σ/σSM) ×Br(h→ χ1χ2→ γ +E/T) from the results of Ref. [15], for mχ1 = (0 GeV, 20 GeV,40 GeV) < mχ2. Solid lines correspond to 100% photon efficiency, and dashed lines to a (flat) 80% photon efficiency.
As with all semi-invisible signals, collider reach could be extended by forming the transverse mass of the visible decay product(s), here the photon, with the missing transverse momentum vector, and requiring this to be bounded from above as consistent with production from an initial resonance. Much better sensitivity could be achieved if the prohibitively hard cut on HT could be relaxed. This HT cut is necessitated by the γ+HT trigger used to select the data in the current analysis, and is not suited well to the study of the relatively low-pT Higgs events. Somewhat better signal acceptance is realized for the monophoton+MET triggers in current use for dark matter searches, though the degree of improvement depends on the spectrum; again, monojet+MET triggers may provide better sensitivity.
References
[1]A. Djouadi and M. Drees, Higgs boson decays into light gravitinos, Phys.Lett. B407 (1997) 243-249, [hep-ph/9703452].
[2]C. Petersson, A. Romagnoni, and R. Torre, Higgs Decay with Monophoton + MET Signature from Low Scale Supersymmetry Breaking, [arXiv:1203.4563].
[3]J. D. Mason, D. E. Morrissey, and D. Poland, Higgs Boson Decays to Neutralinos in Low-Scale Gauge Mediation, Phys.Rev. D80 (2009) 115015, [arXiv:0909.3523].
[4]CMS Collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in events with photons and missing energy.
File translated from TEX by TTH, version 4.03. On 17 Dec 2013, 23:56.
File translated from TEX by TTH, version 4.03. On 17 Dec 2013, 23:56.